“We developed an approach to find the location of trapped miners inside a collapsed mine, regardless of noise from the environment around the mine,” says Sherif Hanafy, an adjunct associate professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah and first author of a study demonstrating the technique.
The method records “seismic ‘fingerprints’ generated by a trapped miner banging on the mine wall, and uses those fingerprints to locate him. Each different location in the mine that is banged has a unique fingerprint,” says Gerard Schuster, a professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah and the study’s senior author.
“We hope to make it easier to find out if miners are alive after a collapse and, if they are alive, where they are located,” he adds. “It’s not guaranteed to work every time, but looks promising from the tests we did. This is not rocket science; it’s rock science.”
The new study was published in this month’s issue of The Leading Edge, a journal of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
The researchers and a number of Utah graduate students tested the system twice. One test was in a utility tunnel beneath the University of Utah campus. The other test was in much deeper tunnels in an abandoned copper mine near Tucson, Ariz.
“We got 100 percent accuracy,” Hanafy says.
Schuster says more testing is needed to make sure the method will work in deeper mines, such as coal mines, which can be a few thousand feet deep. He says that while the method was tested only in horizontal mines tunnels, it also should work in vertical shafts.
Along with Hanafy and Schuster, the study’s coauthors are Weiping Cao, a doctoral student in geology and geophysics, and M.K. “Kim” McCarter, a professor of mining engineering at the University of Utah. In addition to his Utah affiliation, Hanafy is an associate professor of geophysics at Cairo University in Egypt.
How the Method Can Find Trapped Miners
The system developed by the Utah researchers would be installed in stages as a mine is excavated. Components include:
-- Inside mine tunnels, “base stations” are built every 10 yards to every few hundred yards, depending on each tunnel’s length. At each station, a 4-inch-by-4-inch iron plate is bolted to the wall, and a sledgehammer is placed near each plate.
-- On the surface, cables are strung along the ground above each tunnel or shaft, and “geophones” are spaced at regular intervals along the cables. Geophones listen for seismic waves created when miners use the sledgehammer to bang on an iron plate.
-- Once the system is installed, and as the mine expands and base stations are added, each base station is “calibrated,” meaning its plate is whacked and the seismic waves are recorded by the geophones overhead. Each base station has a distinct seismic wave “fingerprint.” So if miners are trapped and bang the metal plate at the nearest base station, the resulting seismic recording will allow rescuers to determine precisely which base station plate was thumped, and thus where the miners are located.
Listening stations would record the seismic wave pattern from each geophone. The collective pattern would be compared – by a computer – with the calibration seismograph recordings collected prior to the collapse. A match identifies the base station or stations where survivors have gathered and walloped the iron plate.
Schuster hopes a company will commercialize the miner-location system. A patent is pending on the method, and University of Utah technology commercialization officials have discussed it with a variety of mining companies.
The system would include perhaps 100 geophones and 100 base stations, and cost about $100,000 for a typical mine – an amount Schuster considers inexpensive.
“It’s like having a fire extinguisher on every floor. How much does that cost?”
Schuster says the system could be expanded – at about double the cost – to allow two-way communications, instead of just signals from trapped miners to rescuers on the surface. Two-way communication would require a computer and geophone at each underground base station to pick up signals from people on the surface.
Hanafy says if miners were unable to reach the nearest base station, simply banging on a mine wall with a rock should produce a “fingerprint” that identifies the nearest base station.
A Method Born from Oil Exploration and the Crandall Canyon Mine Disaster
Schuster’s research, which is funded by 20 oil and gas companies, focuses on developing improved methods to use seismic waves to make three-dimensional images identifying the location of oil, gas and mineral deposits. He will switch to adjunct status at the University of Utah this summer to become a geosciences professor at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in oil-rich Saudi Arabia.
His work on the miner-locating method was triggered by Utah’s Aug. 6, 2007, Crandall Canyon coal mine collapse, which resulted in the deaths of six miners and, 10 days later, three rescuers. Schuster had just returned from a five-month sabbatical in Saudi Arabia, working on a system to use seismic signals to locate the “fluid front” of underground oil being pushed toward a well by injected steam or carbon dioxide gas.
Schuster says the technology in the miner-locating system is one that exploration geophysicists have used since the 1970s to search for oil, and later was adapted by the military to locate submarines with quiet propulsion systems. Just as efforts to determine an earthquake’s location looked at only a small part of the seismic wave signal, so did old efforts to look for submarines by using sound generated by sonar, he says.
With the new technology, “we look at the entire signal,” which Schuster compares with analyzing an entire fingerprint rather than one or two whorls in that fingerprint.
The researchers first tested their system in November 2007 near the David Eccles School of Business on the University of Utah campus. Graduate students set up 25 base stations in a 150-foot-long stretch of tunnel that carries steam pipes and other utilities 10 feet beneath the surface.
Hanafy says they spaced the base stations anywhere from 1.6 feet to 13 feet apart, and whacked each one with a 16-pound sledgehammer while geophones on the surface recorded the seismic waves. Geophones were aligned 115 feet away instead of directly over the tunnel – a way to mimic recording seismic waves from a much deeper tunnel.
“We had 25 base stations inside the tunnel, and we calculated the result for each one assuming a trapped miner was at each one of these,” he says. “We were able to locate exactly where each bang was coming from,” even when stations were only 1.6 feet apart.
The Utah scientists tested the method at more realistic depths at the old Arizona copper mine, where they placed 25 base stations 1.6 feet apart in a 100-foot-deep tunnel, and another 25 base stations 2.5 feet apart in an underlying 150-foot-deep tunnel. On the surface, 120 geophones were set up along a 200-foot-long line running above the two tunnels. Every bang on a base station was accurately located.
Schuster says that to “simulate battlefield conditions” at a working mine, a computer was used to simulate “white noise” that drowned out the real seismic signals by a 2,000-to-1 ratio. He says the seismic signature of a bang on a base station plate still could be distinguished.
“It’s like at a cocktail party you have 2,000 people talking at the same time in different conversations, and somehow you can home in on one conversation,” he says.Contacts:
Lee Siegel | Newswise Science News
Further reports about: > Canyon > Exploration > Geophones > Miners > Trapped Miners > abandoned copper mine > cave-ins > collapsed mine > deeper tunnels > horizontal mines tunnels > iron plates > regular intervals inside mines > rock science > seismic signal > seismic ‘fingerprints’ > sensitive listening devices > sledgehammers
Massive impact crater from a kilometer-wide iron meteorite discovered in Greenland
15.11.2018 | Faculty of Science - University of Copenhagen
The unintended consequences of dams and reservoirs
14.11.2018 | Uppsala University
Researchers at the University of New Hampshire have captured a difficult-to-view singular event involving "magnetic reconnection"--the process by which sparse particles and energy around Earth collide producing a quick but mighty explosion--in the Earth's magnetotail, the magnetic environment that trails behind the planet.
Magnetic reconnection has remained a bit of a mystery to scientists. They know it exists and have documented the effects that the energy explosions can...
Biochips have been developed at TU Wien (Vienna), on which tissue can be produced and examined. This allows supplying the tissue with different substances in a very controlled way.
Cultivating human cells in the Petri dish is not a big challenge today. Producing artificial tissue, however, permeated by fine blood vessels, is a much more...
Faster and secure data communication: This is the goal of a new joint project involving physicists from the University of Würzburg. The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research funds the project with 14.8 million euro.
In our digital world data security and secure communication are becoming more and more important. Quantum communication is a promising approach to achieve...
On Saturday, 10 November 2018, the research icebreaker Polarstern will leave its homeport of Bremerhaven, bound for Cape Town, South Africa.
When choosing materials to make something, trade-offs need to be made between a host of properties, such as thickness, stiffness and weight. Depending on the application in question, finding just the right balance is the difference between success and failure
Now, a team of Penn Engineers has demonstrated a new material they call "nanocardboard," an ultrathin equivalent of corrugated paper cardboard. A square...
09.11.2018 | Event News
06.11.2018 | Event News
23.10.2018 | Event News
16.11.2018 | Health and Medicine
16.11.2018 | Life Sciences
16.11.2018 | Life Sciences