“We developed an approach to find the location of trapped miners inside a collapsed mine, regardless of noise from the environment around the mine,” says Sherif Hanafy, an adjunct associate professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah and first author of a study demonstrating the technique.
The method records “seismic ‘fingerprints’ generated by a trapped miner banging on the mine wall, and uses those fingerprints to locate him. Each different location in the mine that is banged has a unique fingerprint,” says Gerard Schuster, a professor of geology and geophysics at the University of Utah and the study’s senior author.
“We hope to make it easier to find out if miners are alive after a collapse and, if they are alive, where they are located,” he adds. “It’s not guaranteed to work every time, but looks promising from the tests we did. This is not rocket science; it’s rock science.”
The new study was published in this month’s issue of The Leading Edge, a journal of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
The researchers and a number of Utah graduate students tested the system twice. One test was in a utility tunnel beneath the University of Utah campus. The other test was in much deeper tunnels in an abandoned copper mine near Tucson, Ariz.
“We got 100 percent accuracy,” Hanafy says.
Schuster says more testing is needed to make sure the method will work in deeper mines, such as coal mines, which can be a few thousand feet deep. He says that while the method was tested only in horizontal mines tunnels, it also should work in vertical shafts.
Along with Hanafy and Schuster, the study’s coauthors are Weiping Cao, a doctoral student in geology and geophysics, and M.K. “Kim” McCarter, a professor of mining engineering at the University of Utah. In addition to his Utah affiliation, Hanafy is an associate professor of geophysics at Cairo University in Egypt.
How the Method Can Find Trapped Miners
The system developed by the Utah researchers would be installed in stages as a mine is excavated. Components include:
-- Inside mine tunnels, “base stations” are built every 10 yards to every few hundred yards, depending on each tunnel’s length. At each station, a 4-inch-by-4-inch iron plate is bolted to the wall, and a sledgehammer is placed near each plate.
-- On the surface, cables are strung along the ground above each tunnel or shaft, and “geophones” are spaced at regular intervals along the cables. Geophones listen for seismic waves created when miners use the sledgehammer to bang on an iron plate.
-- Once the system is installed, and as the mine expands and base stations are added, each base station is “calibrated,” meaning its plate is whacked and the seismic waves are recorded by the geophones overhead. Each base station has a distinct seismic wave “fingerprint.” So if miners are trapped and bang the metal plate at the nearest base station, the resulting seismic recording will allow rescuers to determine precisely which base station plate was thumped, and thus where the miners are located.
Listening stations would record the seismic wave pattern from each geophone. The collective pattern would be compared – by a computer – with the calibration seismograph recordings collected prior to the collapse. A match identifies the base station or stations where survivors have gathered and walloped the iron plate.
Schuster hopes a company will commercialize the miner-location system. A patent is pending on the method, and University of Utah technology commercialization officials have discussed it with a variety of mining companies.
The system would include perhaps 100 geophones and 100 base stations, and cost about $100,000 for a typical mine – an amount Schuster considers inexpensive.
“It’s like having a fire extinguisher on every floor. How much does that cost?”
Schuster says the system could be expanded – at about double the cost – to allow two-way communications, instead of just signals from trapped miners to rescuers on the surface. Two-way communication would require a computer and geophone at each underground base station to pick up signals from people on the surface.
Hanafy says if miners were unable to reach the nearest base station, simply banging on a mine wall with a rock should produce a “fingerprint” that identifies the nearest base station.
A Method Born from Oil Exploration and the Crandall Canyon Mine Disaster
Schuster’s research, which is funded by 20 oil and gas companies, focuses on developing improved methods to use seismic waves to make three-dimensional images identifying the location of oil, gas and mineral deposits. He will switch to adjunct status at the University of Utah this summer to become a geosciences professor at King Abdullah University of Science and Technology in oil-rich Saudi Arabia.
His work on the miner-locating method was triggered by Utah’s Aug. 6, 2007, Crandall Canyon coal mine collapse, which resulted in the deaths of six miners and, 10 days later, three rescuers. Schuster had just returned from a five-month sabbatical in Saudi Arabia, working on a system to use seismic signals to locate the “fluid front” of underground oil being pushed toward a well by injected steam or carbon dioxide gas.
Schuster says the technology in the miner-locating system is one that exploration geophysicists have used since the 1970s to search for oil, and later was adapted by the military to locate submarines with quiet propulsion systems. Just as efforts to determine an earthquake’s location looked at only a small part of the seismic wave signal, so did old efforts to look for submarines by using sound generated by sonar, he says.
With the new technology, “we look at the entire signal,” which Schuster compares with analyzing an entire fingerprint rather than one or two whorls in that fingerprint.
The researchers first tested their system in November 2007 near the David Eccles School of Business on the University of Utah campus. Graduate students set up 25 base stations in a 150-foot-long stretch of tunnel that carries steam pipes and other utilities 10 feet beneath the surface.
Hanafy says they spaced the base stations anywhere from 1.6 feet to 13 feet apart, and whacked each one with a 16-pound sledgehammer while geophones on the surface recorded the seismic waves. Geophones were aligned 115 feet away instead of directly over the tunnel – a way to mimic recording seismic waves from a much deeper tunnel.
“We had 25 base stations inside the tunnel, and we calculated the result for each one assuming a trapped miner was at each one of these,” he says. “We were able to locate exactly where each bang was coming from,” even when stations were only 1.6 feet apart.
The Utah scientists tested the method at more realistic depths at the old Arizona copper mine, where they placed 25 base stations 1.6 feet apart in a 100-foot-deep tunnel, and another 25 base stations 2.5 feet apart in an underlying 150-foot-deep tunnel. On the surface, 120 geophones were set up along a 200-foot-long line running above the two tunnels. Every bang on a base station was accurately located.
Schuster says that to “simulate battlefield conditions” at a working mine, a computer was used to simulate “white noise” that drowned out the real seismic signals by a 2,000-to-1 ratio. He says the seismic signature of a bang on a base station plate still could be distinguished.
“It’s like at a cocktail party you have 2,000 people talking at the same time in different conversations, and somehow you can home in on one conversation,” he says.Contacts:
Lee Siegel | Newswise Science News
Further reports about: > Canyon > Exploration > Geophones > Miners > Trapped Miners > abandoned copper mine > cave-ins > collapsed mine > deeper tunnels > horizontal mines tunnels > iron plates > regular intervals inside mines > rock science > seismic signal > seismic ‘fingerprints’ > sensitive listening devices > sledgehammers
Fossil coral reefs show sea level rose in bursts during last warming
19.10.2017 | Rice University
NASA finds newly formed tropical storm lan over open waters
17.10.2017 | NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center
University of Maryland researchers contribute to historic detection of gravitational waves and light created by event
On August 17, 2017, at 12:41:04 UTC, scientists made the first direct observation of a merger between two neutron stars--the dense, collapsed cores that remain...
Seven new papers describe the first-ever detection of light from a gravitational wave source. The event, caused by two neutron stars colliding and merging together, was dubbed GW170817 because it sent ripples through space-time that reached Earth on 2017 August 17. Around the world, hundreds of excited astronomers mobilized quickly and were able to observe the event using numerous telescopes, providing a wealth of new data.
Previous detections of gravitational waves have all involved the merger of two black holes, a feat that won the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics earlier this month....
Material defects in end products can quickly result in failures in many areas of industry, and have a massive impact on the safe use of their products. This is why, in the field of quality assurance, intelligent, nondestructive sensor systems play a key role. They allow testing components and parts in a rapid and cost-efficient manner without destroying the actual product or changing its surface. Experts from the Fraunhofer IZFP in Saarbrücken will be presenting two exhibits at the Blechexpo in Stuttgart from 7–10 November 2017 that allow fast, reliable, and automated characterization of materials and detection of defects (Hall 5, Booth 5306).
When quality testing uses time-consuming destructive test methods, it can result in enormous costs due to damaging or destroying the products. And given that...
Using a new cooling technique MPQ scientists succeed at observing collisions in a dense beam of cold and slow dipolar molecules.
How do chemical reactions proceed at extremely low temperatures? The answer requires the investigation of molecular samples that are cold, dense, and slow at...
Scientists from the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, using high precision laser spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen, confirm the surprisingly small value of the proton radius determined from muonic hydrogen.
It was one of the breakthroughs of the year 2010: Laser spectroscopy of muonic hydrogen resulted in a value for the proton charge radius that was significantly...
17.10.2017 | Event News
10.10.2017 | Event News
10.10.2017 | Event News
19.10.2017 | Physics and Astronomy
19.10.2017 | Physics and Astronomy
19.10.2017 | Life Sciences