Except for women in their 40s, women who are screened with mammography every 2 years may not have an increased risk of late-stage breast cancer compared with women screened every year, according to a new study in the December 15 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
The ideal interval between screenings for breast cancer using mammography has not been determined. In the United States, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening with mammography every 1 to 2 years, whereas the American Cancer Society recommends annual screening. In Europe, most countries recommend that women be screened every 2 years and concentrate their recommendations on women age 50 and older.
To determine if women screened every 2 years have an increased risk of late-stage breast cancer, Emily White, Ph.D., of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and colleagues conducted an observational study using data collected by seven mammography registries in the United States. They examined whether the 2,440 women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer after receiving biennial screening were more likely to have been diagnosed with late-stage cancer compared with 5,400 women diagnosed with breast cancer after receiving annual screening.
Among women age 50 years or older, there was no increase in the risk of late-stage breast cancer for those who received screening every 2 years compared with those screened annually. There was also no indication that annual screening would benefit women with dense breasts. However, for women in their 40s, those who received biennial screening were more likely to have late-stage disease when they were diagnosed with breast cancer than were those who received annual mammograms (28% versus 21%).
"In summary, we found little evidence that indicates that women who undergo mammography screening every 2 years have an increased risk of late-stage breast cancer compared with women who undergo annual screening, except for women in their 40s," the authors write. "Our results may be useful for policy makers and for statistical modelers of mammography screening who seek to understand the costs and benefits of screening annually versus every 2 years."
Sarah L. Zielinski | Source: EurekAlert!
Further information: www.oupjournals.org
More articles from Studies and Analyses:
Study Shows Sweetener Marketing Tactics May Mislead Consumers
20.11.2009 | Corn Refiners Association
Debt Stress Drops for Third Straight Month, Survey Finds
20.11.2009 | Ohio State University
Scientists Unravel Evolution of Highly Toxic Box Jellyfish
20.11.2009 | Life Sciences
When good companies do bad things: Examining illegal corporate behavior
20.11.2009 | Business and Finance
UCR plant scientist's research spawns new discoveries showing how crops survive drought
20.11.2009 | Agricultural and Forestry Science
Multidisciplinary meeting on Urological Cancers aims to benefit cancer patients
20.11.2009 | Event News
'Golden Age' for clinical psychology in Northern Ireland
20.11.2009 | Event News
New Perspectives in Marine Anti-Fouling Research
11.11.2009 | Event News