What is the genetic mutation
“Originally, we all had brown eyes”, said Professor Eiberg from the Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology. “But a genetic mutation affecting the OCA2 gene in our chromosomes resulted in the creation of a “switch”, which literally “turned off” the ability to produce brown eyes”. The OCA2 gene codes for the so-called P protein, which is involved in the production of melanin, the pigment that gives colour to our hair, eyes and skin. The “switch”, which is located in the gene adjacent to OCA2 does not, however, turn off the gene entirely, but rather limits its action to reducing the production of melanin in the iris – effectively “diluting” brown eyes to blue. The switch’s effect on OCA2 is very specific. If the OCA2 gene had been completely destroyed or turned off, human beings would be without melanin in their hair, eyes or skin colour – a condition known as albinism.
Limited genetic variation
Variation in the colour of the eyes from brown to green can all be explained by the amount of melanin in the iris, but blue-eyed individuals only have a small degree of variation in the amount of melanin in their eyes. “From this we can conclude that all blue-eyed individuals are linked to the same ancestor,” says Professor Eiberg. “They have all inherited the same switch at exactly the same spot in their DNA.” Brown-eyed individuals, by contrast, have considerable individual variation in the area of their DNA that controls melanin production.
Professor Eiberg and his team examined mitochondrial DNA and compared the eye colour of blue-eyed individuals in countries as diverse as Jordan, Denmark and Turkey. His findings are the latest in a decade of genetic research, which began in 1996, when Professor Eiberg first implicated the OCA2 gene as being responsible for eye colour.
Nature shuffles our genes
The mutation of brown eyes to blue represents neither a positive nor a negative mutation. It is one of several mutations such as hair colour, baldness, freckles and beauty spots, which neither increases nor reduces a human’s chance of survival. As Professor Eiberg says, “it simply shows that nature is constantly shuffling the human genome, creating a genetic cocktail of human chromosomes and trying out different changes as it does so.”
Sandra Szivos | Source: alphagalileo
Further information:
www.ku.dk/english/news/?content=http://www.ku.dk/english/news/blue-eyes.htm
More articles from Life Sciences:
Sweet! -- sugar plays key role in cell division
08.02.2010 | Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
NTU researchers complete the world's first in-depth study of the malaria parasite genome
08.02.2010 | Nanyang Technological University
08.02.2010 | Studies and Analyses
Princeton scientist makes a leap in quantum computing
08.02.2010 | Information Technology
Sweet! -- sugar plays key role in cell division
08.02.2010 | Life Sciences
Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information and Telecommunication Technologies 2010 (APSITT 2010)
04.02.2010 | Event News
The Engineering Conference (EnCon 2010)
04.02.2010 | Event News
Homeland Security Science and Technology University Network Summit
01.02.2010 | Event News