The underlying structure of a fault determines whether an earthquake rupture will jump from one fault to another, magnifying its size and potential devastation. Understanding why some earthquakes terminate along a fault, while others jump or step-over a gap to another fault, is essential to forecasting the seismic hazard of complex fault systems, such as the San Andreas Fault.
In a paper published in this issue of BSSA, author David Oglesby of University of California at Riverside suggests that the pattern of stress at the end of the primary fault can strongly affect an earthquake’s ability to jump to a secondary fault.
He suggests that a smooth, gradual decrease in stress along a rupture results in slower rupture deceleration, less strain, less generation of seismic waves, and lowers the likelihood that the earthquake will jump to another fault.
In contrast, a stress pattern that terminates suddenly leads to abrupt rupture termination, higher strain, more seismic radiation, and a higher likelihood of the rupture jumping to a secondary fault.
The results of this numerical study illustrate the importance of the slip gradient and the acceleration of the rupture front in determining the probability of a rupture jumping from one fault segment to another.
Nan Broadbent | Source: EurekAlert!
Further information: www.seismosoc.org
More articles from
Earth Sciences:
Deep biosphere research points to new methods for recovering petroleum
10.10.2008 | Arizona State University
Volcanic eruptions more complex and harder to predict
10.10.2008 | University of East Anglia
Scientists find new insight into genome of neglected malaria parasite
10.10.2008 | Life Sciences
Hodgkin lymphoma -- new characteristics discovered
10.10.2008 | Life Sciences
Digital zebrafish embryo provides the first complete developmental blueprint of a vertebrate
10.10.2008 | Life Sciences