An often-used tool to diagnose very common and sometimes limb-threatening bone infections in persons with diabetes may not be as reliable as many once believed, based on a recent study by a transatlantic team of researchers. The study, published to the Web ahead of print in February's edition of the journal Diabetes Care, longitudinally evaluated a large sample of persons with diabetes with wounds, and tested the commonly performed "probe to bone" test. The test, which uses a sterile instrument to feel for bone inside a wound, has been thought by many to be highly predictive of bone infection.
"It certainly makes sense that if you can feel bone, then it must be infected," noted David G. Armstrong, DPM, PhD, Professor of Surgery at Scholl's Center for Lower Extremity Ambulatory Research (CLEAR) at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, and a co-investigator on the study. "Unfortunately, though, this doesn't always seem to be the case. The test, if used by itself in a normal clinical setting, isn't much better than flipping a coin. We therefore recommend it be used with other aids, such as biopsy or appropriate imaging tools."
Kathy Peterson | Source: EurekAlert!
Further information: www.lifeindiscovery.com
www.rosalindfranklin.edu
More articles from Health and Medicine:
New discovery about the formation of new brain cells
23.11.2009 | University of Gothenburg
Women Can Quit Smoking and Control Weight Gain
23.11.2009 | Northwestern University
UCSB physicists move 1 step closer to quantum computing
23.11.2009 | Physics and Astronomy
Fat around the middle increases the risk of dementia
23.11.2009 | Studies and Analyses
New discovery about the formation of new brain cells
23.11.2009 | Health and Medicine
Multidisciplinary meeting on Urological Cancers aims to benefit cancer patients
20.11.2009 | Event News
'Golden Age' for clinical psychology in Northern Ireland
20.11.2009 | Event News
New Perspectives in Marine Anti-Fouling Research
11.11.2009 | Event News