Deciding whether surgical (revascularization) or nonsurgical treatment of heart failure would be better, in terms of risks versus benefits, is difficult.
Using data from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH), Tsuyuki and associates compare survival outcomes among patients with heart failure treated medically and those who underwent coronary revascularization.
In a related commentary, Senior notes the limitations of retrospective, observational studies and the ongoing uncertainty about the safety and benefits of revascularization in patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease.
Dr. Michelle Graham | Source: EurekAlert!
Further information: www.cmaj.ca/
How will the Arctic sea ice cover develop this summer?
08.07.2008 | Earth Sciences
Geologists study China earthquake for glimpse into future
08.07.2008 | Earth Sciences
Study shows rise in Cornwall's dolphin, whale and porpoise deaths
08.07.2008 | Studies and Analyses