Two recent papers describing the sequencing of Neanderthal nuclear DNA from fossil bone held promise for finally answering this question [1, 2]. However, the two studies came to very different conclusions regarding the ancestral role of Neanderthals.
Jeffrey D. Wall and Sung K. Kim from University of California San Francisco now reveal in PLoS Genetics what they found when they reanalyzed the data from the two original studies.
Wall and Kim’s reanalysis reveals inconsistencies between them and they believe that possible contamination with modern human DNA and/or a high rate of sequencing errors compromised the findings of one of the original Neanderthal DNA studies.
The authors therefore recommend that we carefully evaluate published and future data before arriving at any firm conclusions about human evolution.
Andrew Hyde | Source: alphagalileo
Further information: www.plos.org/press/plge-03-10-07-wall.pdf
plosgenetics.org
Further Reports about: DNA > Neanderthal > studies
More articles from
Life Sciences:
Genetic Biobanks: Deposits, Withdrawals, and Consumer Protection
21.11.2008 | Genetics and Public Policy Center
Research Consortium to Sequence Turkey Genome
21.11.2008 | Virginia Tech (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University)
Sustainable garden roofs developed as a new construction material
21.11.2008 | Studies and Analyses
Bees declared the winners in Earthwatch’s ‘irreplaceable species’ battle
21.11.2008 | Ecology, The Environment and Conservation
Hairspray is linked to common genital birth defect
21.11.2008 | Studies and Analyses
The Automobile – The Transition from Energy Guzzler to Power Supplier
20.11.2008 | Event News
Ministers meet to define the role of space in delivering global objectives
18.11.2008 | Event News
156th Annual Acoustical Society of America (ASA) Meeting in Miami
28.10.2008 | Event News