Two recent papers describing the sequencing of Neanderthal nuclear DNA from fossil bone held promise for finally answering this question [1, 2]. However, the two studies came to very different conclusions regarding the ancestral role of Neanderthals.
Jeffrey D. Wall and Sung K. Kim from University of California San Francisco now reveal in PLoS Genetics what they found when they reanalyzed the data from the two original studies.
Wall and Kim’s reanalysis reveals inconsistencies between them and they believe that possible contamination with modern human DNA and/or a high rate of sequencing errors compromised the findings of one of the original Neanderthal DNA studies.
The authors therefore recommend that we carefully evaluate published and future data before arriving at any firm conclusions about human evolution.
Andrew Hyde | Source: alphagalileo
Further information: www.plos.org/press/plge-03-10-07-wall.pdf
plosgenetics.org
Further Reports about: DNA > Neanderthal > studies
More articles from Life Sciences:
Scientists watch as peptides control crystal growth with ‘switches, throttles and brakes’
25.11.2009 | DOE/Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Arsenic and Gold Clusters
25.11.2009 | Angewandte Chemie International Edition
First black holes may have incubated in giant, starlike cocoons
25.11.2009 | Physics and Astronomy
KfW issues its first ever 7 year Euro-Benchmark
25.11.2009 | Business and Finance
Intelligence inside metal components
25.11.2009 | Information Technology
Multidisciplinary meeting on Urological Cancers aims to benefit cancer patients
20.11.2009 | Event News
'Golden Age' for clinical psychology in Northern Ireland
20.11.2009 | Event News
New Perspectives in Marine Anti-Fouling Research
11.11.2009 | Event News