Forum for Science, Industry and Business
Sponsored by:     Siemens  n-tv 
Search our Site:

Topic (optional):

 

Home Reports Life Sciences Content

Comparison of cocaine and methamphetamine ’highs’ finds differences in onset, pattern and duration

next article
25.08.2005

 


Investigators at the Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA examining responses to cocaine and methamphetamine use find distinct differences in onset, pattern and duration.

Subjective, or self-reported, responses to cocaine peak and decline more rapidly than those of methamphetamine, the study shows. Cardiovascular responses to the two stimulants are similar at onset but responses to cocaine decline more rapidly.


In press with the peer-reviewed journal Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, the study is the first to use identical procedures in measuring and comparing subjective and cardiovascular responses to the two stimulants.

"These differences help explain patterns of use by addicts. Methamphetamine users, for instance, report using the drug daily throughout each day, while cocaine users typically engage in binges that occur most often in the evening," said Dr. Thomas F. Newton, the study’s principal investigator and a research scientist at the Semel Institute.

"In addition, the study results may impact development of medication treatments for addiction to these two very different stimulants," said Newton, a professor of psychiatry and biobehavioral sciences at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA.

The study examined the onset, pattern and duration of the response to cocaine in 14 cocaine dependent volunteers and the response to methamphetamine in 11 methamphetamine dependent volunteers. None of the volunteers were seeking treatment.

Study volunteers reported subjective effects using a sliding rating scale ranging from 0, or "no drug effect," to 100, "most drug effect ever." Ratings were obtained just prior to administration of the drug and at regular intervals for 30 minutes following administration.

Heart rate and blood pressures were assessed using an automated device just prior to administration of the drug and at regular intervals for 60 minutes following administration.

Dan Page | Source: EurekAlert!
Further information: www.mednet.ucla.edu
www.npi.ucla.edu/
www.medsch.ucla.edu/

next article

More articles from Life Sciences:

nachricht Scientists watch as peptides control crystal growth with ‘switches, throttles and brakes’
25.11.2009 | DOE/Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

nachricht Arsenic and Gold Clusters
25.11.2009 | Angewandte Chemie International Edition

All articles from Life Sciences >>>

B2B Search

Product / Service
Company / Organisation

Latest News

First black holes may have incubated in giant, starlike cocoons

25.11.2009 | Physics and Astronomy

KfW issues its first ever 7 year Euro-Benchmark

25.11.2009 | Business and Finance

Intelligence inside metal components

25.11.2009 | Information Technology

VideoLinks
More VideoLinks >>>

Event News

Multidisciplinary meeting on Urological Cancers aims to benefit cancer patients

20.11.2009 | Event News

'Golden Age' for clinical psychology in Northern Ireland

20.11.2009 | Event News

New Perspectives in Marine Anti-Fouling Research

11.11.2009 | Event News