Forum for Science, Industry and Business

Sponsored by:     3M 
Search our Site:

 

Noospheric Reality

05.04.2005


A specialist of the Vavilov Institute of Natural History and Engineering, Russian Academy of Sciences, A.G. Nazarov has considered Vernadsky’s famous concept on biosphere transmutation into noosphere ("sphere of human thought") from the ecological point of view and has come to the conclusion that noospheric reconstruction of biosphere has no prospects and is unreal.



V.I.Vernadsky had no time to develop himself an integral doctrine about noosphere. In the 20s of the last century he still considered human activity as a force alien to biosphere, but 15 to 20 years later he put forward an idea of biosphere’s “transmutation”, “transition” into noosphere. V.I.Vernadsky had in view that human beings would undertake control and government of all global processes of substance and energy exchange, but he did not point out how specifically all this would happen. Vernadsky believed that one of important prerequisites for noosphere formation was “complete populating of biosphere by human beings”, and the main indications of imminent transition was extinction of multiple species of wild animals and plants, as well as amelioration of vast areas. Nowadays, these changes that made the scientist so glad have grown up to reach the scope of global ecological crisis. Noospheric reality – this is the destruction of our natural habitat. Nevertheless, hundreds of scientists, followers of Vernadsky, hope that his theory will permit to overcome the current ecological crisis.

Relationship between noospheric doctrine and ecology are not simple in general. Vernadsky did not virtually refer to ecologists in his works, and ecologists do not practically discuss now the idea of biosphere turning into noosphere. In A.G. Nazarov’s opinion, “transmutation” of biosphere is not possible even theoretically. To manage all biospheric processes, mankind should control their information flows. But a single bacterium lets pass through itself as much information as a contemporary PC does. The total amount of such cells on the Earth makes 10 in the 28th power. That is 20 times higher that the number of people on the planet and 22 times more than the number of computers available. It is beyond mankind’s power to cope with the information gap of such extent.


So, entire biosphere is beyond human control, but human beings will probably be able to govern some part of it. Now, human beings control only several dozens of domestic animal species and about 300 species of cultivated plants. However, artificial communities (agrocoenoses) created by human beings are very simplified and therefore are unable to perform autoregulation. Agrocoenoses ruin natural ecosustems surrounding them, significantly yielding in productivity (sometimes by several times). Reclaimed meadows demonstrate the highest productivity – 22.4 tons per hectare, and taiga’s productivity is 400. Agrocoenoses cannot exist without fertilizers and pesticides that contaminate both environment and the harvest itself.

Mankind is unable to cope with vermin, weeds, pathogens, ecosystem degradation. It is unable to do away with wastes: even partial elimination of wastes requires enormous expenses and energy consumption. Complete wastelessness is impossible for the same reasons. The social evolution rate together with all its destroying impacts on biosphere is 3 to 5 times higher than the biological evolution rate, this excluding possibility for any adaptation of biosphere to man-caused changes. Therefore, adaptatin in the “nature-society” system is possible only in case if mankind accommodates itself to the laws of biosphere and strictly adheres to them. However, for the time being man and nature are in state of war, and we are now witnessing biosphere’s attempts to “discard” man through new diseases, genetic and mental disorders as the most hazardous organism.

In A.G. Nazarov’s opinion, it is necessary to control not biosphere but “noospheroegenesis”, i.e. to implement only comprehensively justified actions, which lessen acuteness of contradictions between nature and society. Such co-adaptation strategy as regards to biosphere may and should include reduction of the Earth’s population, limitation of consumption, formation of new biospheric education, which fully contradicts to Vernadsky’s main ideas. However, these measures can (according to estimates of the Roman Club members) decrease antropogenic burden on biosphere by 1,000 times and more. Carrying out of such strategy would not at all infringe upon human rights and personal liberty, as it is aimed at ensuring the highest human right to live and at improving quality of life. Provided this strategy is adopted, the “age of noosphere” may only be welcomed at least as unrealizable, but alluring goal, inspiring hope for longer mankind’s survival.

Sergey Komarov | alfa
Further information:
http://www.informnauka.ru

More articles from Life Sciences:

nachricht Topologische Quantenchemie
21.07.2017 | Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Physik fester Stoffe

nachricht Topological Quantum Chemistry
21.07.2017 | Max-Planck-Institut für Chemische Physik fester Stoffe

All articles from Life Sciences >>>

The most recent press releases about innovation >>>

Die letzten 5 Focus-News des innovations-reports im Überblick:

Im Focus: 3-D scanning with water

3-D shape acquisition using water displacement as the shape sensor for the reconstruction of complex objects

A global team of computer scientists and engineers have developed an innovative technique that more completely reconstructs challenging 3D objects. An ancient...

Im Focus: Manipulating Electron Spins Without Loss of Information

Physicists have developed a new technique that uses electrical voltages to control the electron spin on a chip. The newly-developed method provides protection from spin decay, meaning that the contained information can be maintained and transmitted over comparatively large distances, as has been demonstrated by a team from the University of Basel’s Department of Physics and the Swiss Nanoscience Institute. The results have been published in Physical Review X.

For several years, researchers have been trying to use the spin of an electron to store and transmit information. The spin of each electron is always coupled...

Im Focus: The proton precisely weighted

What is the mass of a proton? Scientists from Germany and Japan successfully did an important step towards the most exact knowledge of this fundamental constant. By means of precision measurements on a single proton, they could improve the precision by a factor of three and also correct the existing value.

To determine the mass of a single proton still more accurate – a group of physicists led by Klaus Blaum and Sven Sturm of the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear...

Im Focus: On the way to a biological alternative

A bacterial enzyme enables reactions that open up alternatives to key industrial chemical processes

The research team of Prof. Dr. Oliver Einsle at the University of Freiburg's Institute of Biochemistry has long been exploring the functioning of nitrogenase....

Im Focus: The 1 trillion tonne iceberg

Larsen C Ice Shelf rift finally breaks through

A one trillion tonne iceberg - one of the biggest ever recorded -- has calved away from the Larsen C Ice Shelf in Antarctica, after a rift in the ice,...

All Focus news of the innovation-report >>>

Anzeige

Anzeige

Event News

Closing the Sustainability Circle: Protection of Food with Biobased Materials

21.07.2017 | Event News

»We are bringing Additive Manufacturing to SMEs«

19.07.2017 | Event News

The technology with a feel for feelings

12.07.2017 | Event News

 
Latest News

Ultrathin device harvests electricity from human motion

24.07.2017 | Power and Electrical Engineering

Scientists announce the quest for high-index materials

24.07.2017 | Materials Sciences

ADIR Project: Lasers Recover Valuable Materials

24.07.2017 | Materials Sciences

VideoLinks
B2B-VideoLinks
More VideoLinks >>>