Threatened species are characterized by declining and eventually small numbers of individuals. Once a population has been reduced below a certain level, its chances of recovery are slim.
This size is commonly referred to as a ‘minimum viable population’, or MVP. But is there one size that fits all species, or are MVPs more idiosyncratic?
Many have shown that the relative susceptibility of species to human-caused decline and extinction can be predicted by traits such as body size, ecological specialization, dispersal ability, fertility, and so on.
However, a recent paper published in Ecology Letters by Brook, Traill and Bradshaw of Charles Darwin University in Australia shows that this is not true for MVP. By modelling the long-term monitoring data of 1198 species they reveal a wide range of MVPs which are strongly linked to local environmental variability but unrelated to intrinsic ecological attributes.
Any commonalities between species in MVP are swamped by the large-scale processes (e.g., habitat loss, over-exploitation) driving the global biodiversity crisis.
Katherine Palmer | Source: alphagalileo
Further information: www.blackwellpublishing.com
More articles from Ecology, The Environment and Conservation:
Hidden threat: Elevated pollution levels near regional airports
20.11.2009 | American Chemical Society
Fossil fuel CO2 emissions up by 29 percent since 2000
19.11.2009 | University of East Anglia
Scientists Unravel Evolution of Highly Toxic Box Jellyfish
20.11.2009 | Life Sciences
When good companies do bad things: Examining illegal corporate behavior
20.11.2009 | Business and Finance
UCR plant scientist's research spawns new discoveries showing how crops survive drought
20.11.2009 | Agricultural and Forestry Science
Multidisciplinary meeting on Urological Cancers aims to benefit cancer patients
20.11.2009 | Event News
'Golden Age' for clinical psychology in Northern Ireland
20.11.2009 | Event News
New Perspectives in Marine Anti-Fouling Research
11.11.2009 | Event News