Why does it take so long for fish stocks to recover from over-fishing? This problem has been worrying both scientists and fishery managers who expect stocks to quickly rebound when fishing stops.
Now a research team from Stony Brook University believes they have an answer: continually harvesting the largest and oldest fish (as fishing regulations typically require) alters not only size but also numerous other genetic characteristics that are harmful to the overall population.
As reported in Ecology Letters, the researchers experimentally harvested captive groups of a marine fish named the Atlantic silverside. Removing the largest fish over several generations gradually caused a “Darwinian debt”: the fish that remained in these populations became progressively smaller but surprisingly many other traits also changed including fewer and smaller eggs with lower survival and growth.
Even behavioural traits like foraging and feeding rate declined. Collectively these changes hamper population recovery and because they are genetic, they don’t immediately go away when fishing ceases. How long it would take to undo the debt is now being studied by the research team.
Lynne Miller | Source: alphagalileo
Further information: www.blackwellpublishing.com
More articles from Ecology, The Environment and Conservation:
A Year After Discovery, Congo’s “Mother Lode” of Gorillas Remains Vulnerable
25.11.2009 | Wildlife Conservation Society
Fish Food Fight: Fish Don’t Eat Trees After All
25.11.2009 | University of Washington
First black holes may have incubated in giant, starlike cocoons
25.11.2009 | Physics and Astronomy
KfW issues its first ever 7 year Euro-Benchmark
25.11.2009 | Business and Finance
Intelligence inside metal components
25.11.2009 | Information Technology
Multidisciplinary meeting on Urological Cancers aims to benefit cancer patients
20.11.2009 | Event News
'Golden Age' for clinical psychology in Northern Ireland
20.11.2009 | Event News
New Perspectives in Marine Anti-Fouling Research
11.11.2009 | Event News