This is a result of the “EU Software Cluster Benchmark 2013” (http://www.softwareclusterbenchmark.eu) published today. This study analyses 15 European hotspots of the software industry in-depth and highlights the identities of these European Silicon Valleys.
It reveals a division in two kinds of clusters: those that are big and those that are “hungry”, i.e. growing dynamically. The Silicon Valley in the US, however, manages to combine both attributes and be big and growing at the same time.
While several of the European clusters are internationally competitive in certain aspects, no European software cluster so far comes close to the original Silicon Valley as a whole. However, instead of only trying to replicate the Silicon Valley, European software clusters should also develop individual growth paths and build on peer learning, representatives of several clusters agreed upon in a press conference.
Other than in the US where the Silicon Valley is the main place where software innovations are created and distributed worldwide, the hotbeds of the European software industry are dispersed all over the continent. What are the individual strengths and weaknesses of the European software clusters, where do they stand in comparison to the Silicon Valley and which measures could be taken to improve their competitiveness? To answer these questions, the German Software-Cluster commissioned the “EU Software Cluster Benchmark 2013”.
The study ranks the European software clusters according to seven categories: employment, turnover, growth dynamics, human capital, company demographics, general factors, and industry specific factors. Of the 15 software clusters analyzed, only five achieve top scores in several of the categories: London, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire (BBO), Île-de-France, Stockholm and the German Software-Cluster. While the Software-Cluster is the cluster with the highest turnover, London achieves top scores in terms of human capital and general factors and is Europe’s global node for IT Services and venture capital.
Île-de-France is a still growing software giant with a strong R&D infrastructure, and Stockholm manages to be a well-balanced highly specialized cluster with a strong turnover. Even clusters that otherwise fall behind in comparison manage to outshine others in certain aspects: the Copenhagen Capital region (Hovedstaden) is especially strong in its industry-specific factors while Warsaw region (Mazowieckie) excels through its growth dynamics.
However, the study also notes that while several of the clusters are internationally competitive in certain aspects, no European software cluster so far comes close to the original Silicon Valley as a whole. European software cluster are unbalanced – either in the direction of being comparably big and saturated or rather small and dynamically growing.
As a result, the study helps to identify pathways to improving the competitiveness of European software clusters. During a press conference on November 25th, 2013, representatives of several clusters outlined further steps to be taken in that direction by policymakers and industry. They came to the joint assessment that an increased peer learning between the European software clusters could help to spread good practices that might be easier to implement than US practices due to the common EU political and cultural context. While the gap to the Silicon Valley is still very large, European software clusters should furthermore develop individual growth paths that build on local and regional assets, e.g. the industrial structure of each region.
Quotes from the speakers in the press conference:
Dr. Stephan Fischer, President of the Software-Cluster Strategy Board and Director TIP Strategic Innovation at SAP AG:
“The software sector is a key driver of the competitiveness of the EU and influences the innovation capabilities across all sectors. However, innovation today is collaborative. In the German Software-Cluster, large and medium-sized software companies together with renowned research institutions have joined their complementary competencies for a couple of years now to develop the foundations for tomorrow’s enterprise sector. In this spirit, we have also commissioned the “EU Software Cluster Benchmark 2013” to chart the profiles of European software clusters and find complementarities, so that coordinated actions and collaborations between clusters become possible.”
Karl-Heinz Streibich, CEO of Software AG, Germany
“The cluster benchmark clearly shows that we have made tremendous progress in recent years. The European software industry is an important catalyst of the European high-tech industry", said Karl-Heinz Streibich, CEO of Software AG. "However, the results also underline that - compared to global standards - all European clusters have to catch up. It must be our goal to achieve industrial strength on a global scale in order to remain competitive on the international stage. The clusters still need better framework conditions and the support from politics - on the national as well as the European level."
Bernhard-Louis Roques, CEO of Truffle Capital, France
"Truffle Capital publishes today also the latest edition of the Truffle 100 Europe, the ranking of the 100 biggest European software companies. It shows that the European software sector remains a force to be reckoned with, despite the current economic difficulties. Europe depends now more than ever on its innovative sectors in order to be competitive. However, we should stress out that profits of the 100 decreased by 8.7% due to more important challenges than ever. The entrepreneurs of this industry are optimistic regardless of the difficult economic time we are going through as they are planning on investing in manpower and R&D and forsee a 5 to 15% growth in 2014”, commented Truffle Capital co-founder and CEO Bernard-Louis Roques.
Glen Manchester, CEO of Thunderhead.com, UK
“The findings of this study are very encouraging for the European software industry, and an illuminating reminder of both the strength of innovation across the region as well as the real challenges that confront us in converting that innovation into sustainable global business outcomes,” said Glen Manchester, CEO of Thunderhead.com. “While the study points to the need and opportunities for greater collaboration and networking between clusters, the outstanding issue highlighted in my view is the problem of how we can improve the entrepreneurial climate in Europe.”
The following software clusters were included in the study: Berlin, Upper Bavaria, the German Software-Cluster around Darmstadt, Kaiserslautern, Karlsruhe and Saarbrücken; London, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire & Oxfordshire, Île de France, Copenhagen Capital Region, Helsinki Region, Stockholm, Madrid, Lombardia, Utrecht, Budapest region, Warsaw region, Prague.
The study was conducted by the Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI) in Karlsruhe, Germany.The full study, images and additional information can be downloaded at:
Bernd Hartmann | idw
Obstructing the ‘inner eye’
07.07.2017 | Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Drone vs. truck deliveries: Which create less carbon pollution?
31.05.2017 | University of Washington
3-D shape acquisition using water displacement as the shape sensor for the reconstruction of complex objects
A global team of computer scientists and engineers have developed an innovative technique that more completely reconstructs challenging 3D objects. An ancient...
Physicists have developed a new technique that uses electrical voltages to control the electron spin on a chip. The newly-developed method provides protection from spin decay, meaning that the contained information can be maintained and transmitted over comparatively large distances, as has been demonstrated by a team from the University of Basel’s Department of Physics and the Swiss Nanoscience Institute. The results have been published in Physical Review X.
For several years, researchers have been trying to use the spin of an electron to store and transmit information. The spin of each electron is always coupled...
What is the mass of a proton? Scientists from Germany and Japan successfully did an important step towards the most exact knowledge of this fundamental constant. By means of precision measurements on a single proton, they could improve the precision by a factor of three and also correct the existing value.
To determine the mass of a single proton still more accurate – a group of physicists led by Klaus Blaum and Sven Sturm of the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear...
The research team of Prof. Dr. Oliver Einsle at the University of Freiburg's Institute of Biochemistry has long been exploring the functioning of nitrogenase....
A one trillion tonne iceberg - one of the biggest ever recorded -- has calved away from the Larsen C Ice Shelf in Antarctica, after a rift in the ice,...
21.07.2017 | Event News
19.07.2017 | Event News
12.07.2017 | Event News
24.07.2017 | Power and Electrical Engineering
24.07.2017 | Materials Sciences
24.07.2017 | Materials Sciences