Forum for Science, Industry and Business

Sponsored by:     3M 
Search our Site:

 

New study ranks graduate decision programs

25.10.2004


Highest ratings to Duke, Harvard, Stanford

A newly-commissioned study of 34 graduate school decision programs in the United States rated those at Duke University, Harvard University, and Stanford University the leading prescriptive programs in the field, according to researchers at the annual meeting of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS®).

The leading descriptive graduate programs cited were Carnegie Mellon University, University of Chicago, and the University of Pennsylvania. "Recognizing the importance of our nation’s intellectual decision making resources, the Decision Analysis Society, a professional society of INFORMS, decided to sponsor an inventory and evaluation of these resources," explained Ralph Keeney, one of the study’s authors and a past president of the Decision Analysis Society.



"The intellectual knowledge created and disseminated by faculty in our universities about how to make better decisions is a very important national resource. This claim follows from two simple facts: First, the only way that individuals and organizations can purposefully influence their future is by their decisions, and second, with knowledge and skills that can be taught, people can learn to make better decisions. It is easy to imagine that the lives of our students and the futures of our businesses, organizations, and country would be much brighter if our students were taught how to make more informed choices."

The results of the study were presented at the annual meeting of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS®) on Sunday, October 24 at 10 AM in the Plaza Building, Directors Row H at the Adams Mark Hotel. Prescriptive decision programs concern how people should gather information and make better decisions. Descriptive decision programs concern how people do process judgments and make decisions.

Following is the Evaluation of Prescriptive Graduate Decision Programs
(Note: Programs are listed alphabetically within categories):

  • 5-Stars: Duke University, Harvard University, Stanford University
  • 4-Stars: Arizona State University, Carnegie Mellon University, University of California at Irvine, University of Pennsylvania
  • 3-Stars: George Washington University, Johns Hopkins University, Ohio State University, University of California at Berkeley, University of Michigan, University of Virginia, University of Wisconsin
  • 2-Stars: Columbia University, Cornell University, Northwestern University, University of California at Los Angeles, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Minnesota, University of Southern California, University of Texas at Austin
  • 1-Star: Georgia Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, New York University, University of Arizona, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Oregon, Yale University
    Following is the Evaluation of Descriptive Graduate Decision Programs

(Note: Programs are listed alphabetically within categories):

  • 5-Stars: Carnegie Mellon University, University of Chicago, University of Pennsylvania
  • 4-Stars: Columbia University, Duke University, Princeton University, University of California at Berkeley
  • 3-Stars: Cornell University, Harvard University, University of Arizona, University of California at Irvine, University of California at Los Angeles, University of Maryland, University of Michigan, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Texas at Austin
  • 2-Stars: New York University, Stanford University, University of Colorado at Boulder, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, University of Minnesota, University of Oregon
  • 1-Star: Arizona State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northwestern University, Ohio State University, University of Iowa, Yale University

The rating key follows:

  • Exceptional (five stars): Recognized as a national leader for the outstanding quality of its annual contributions to education, research, and service
  • Excellent (four stars): Recognized nationally for the superior quality of its routine contributions to education, research, and service
  • High Quality (three stars): Recognized for the high quality of its regular contributions in both educational and research areas
  • Quality (two stars): Regularly makes significant contributions to either education or research
  • Contributing (one star): Makes some important educational or research contributions

"Inventory and Appraisal of U.S. Graduate Decision Programs" is by Ralph L. Keeney, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University; Kelly E. See, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; and Detlof von Winterfeldt, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California.

The study examines graduate decision programs that are currently making important contributions to the decision fields. The authors relied on the number of faculty from various universities in the professional societies concerned with prescriptive decision analysis and descriptive decision research to select 24 top universities. Then, a list of ten faculty members at ten different universities helped select 10 additional universities in a polling process.

Barry List | EurekAlert!
Further information:
http://www.informs.org

More articles from Studies and Analyses:

nachricht A sudden drop in outdoor temperature increases the risk of respiratory infections
11.01.2017 | University of Gothenburg

nachricht Urbanization to convert 300,000 km2 of prime croplands
27.12.2016 | Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC) gGmbH

All articles from Studies and Analyses >>>

The most recent press releases about innovation >>>

Die letzten 5 Focus-News des innovations-reports im Überblick:

Im Focus: How gut bacteria can make us ill

HZI researchers decipher infection mechanisms of Yersinia and immune responses of the host

Yersiniae cause severe intestinal infections. Studies using Yersinia pseudotuberculosis as a model organism aim to elucidate the infection mechanisms of these...

Im Focus: Interfacial Superconductivity: Magnetic and superconducting order revealed simultaneously

Researchers from the University of Hamburg in Germany, in collaboration with colleagues from the University of Aarhus in Denmark, have synthesized a new superconducting material by growing a few layers of an antiferromagnetic transition-metal chalcogenide on a bismuth-based topological insulator, both being non-superconducting materials.

While superconductivity and magnetism are generally believed to be mutually exclusive, surprisingly, in this new material, superconducting correlations...

Im Focus: Studying fundamental particles in materials

Laser-driving of semimetals allows creating novel quasiparticle states within condensed matter systems and switching between different states on ultrafast time scales

Studying properties of fundamental particles in condensed matter systems is a promising approach to quantum field theory. Quasiparticles offer the opportunity...

Im Focus: Designing Architecture with Solar Building Envelopes

Among the general public, solar thermal energy is currently associated with dark blue, rectangular collectors on building roofs. Technologies are needed for aesthetically high quality architecture which offer the architect more room for manoeuvre when it comes to low- and plus-energy buildings. With the “ArKol” project, researchers at Fraunhofer ISE together with partners are currently developing two façade collectors for solar thermal energy generation, which permit a high degree of design flexibility: a strip collector for opaque façade sections and a solar thermal blind for transparent sections. The current state of the two developments will be presented at the BAU 2017 trade fair.

As part of the “ArKol – development of architecturally highly integrated façade collectors with heat pipes” project, Fraunhofer ISE together with its partners...

Im Focus: How to inflate a hardened concrete shell with a weight of 80 t

At TU Wien, an alternative for resource intensive formwork for the construction of concrete domes was developed. It is now used in a test dome for the Austrian Federal Railways Infrastructure (ÖBB Infrastruktur).

Concrete shells are efficient structures, but not very resource efficient. The formwork for the construction of concrete domes alone requires a high amount of...

All Focus news of the innovation-report >>>

Anzeige

Anzeige

Event News

12V, 48V, high-voltage – trends in E/E automotive architecture

10.01.2017 | Event News

2nd Conference on Non-Textual Information on 10 and 11 May 2017 in Hannover

09.01.2017 | Event News

Nothing will happen without batteries making it happen!

05.01.2017 | Event News

 
Latest News

A big nano boost for solar cells

18.01.2017 | Power and Electrical Engineering

Glass's off-kilter harmonies

18.01.2017 | Materials Sciences

Toward a 'smart' patch that automatically delivers insulin when needed

18.01.2017 | Life Sciences

VideoLinks
B2B-VideoLinks
More VideoLinks >>>