Forum for Science, Industry and Business

Sponsored by:     3M 
Search our Site:

 

New EU reforms fail European wildlife

06.06.2014

Despite political proclamation of increased environmental focus, experts argue that the European Union’s recent agricultural reforms are far too weak to have any positive impact on the continent’s shrinking farmland biodiversity, and call on member states to take action.

• About half of all farmland and at least 88% of EU farmers are exempt from Ecological Focus Areas, the main “greening measure” that could help wildlife on farmland.


Intensive agriculture in the area of Querfurt Plate, Germany.

Photo: André Künzelmann/UFZ


The agriculture in Transylvania (Romania) is still largely traditional but in change.

Photo: Tibor Hartel/Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

• Meeting EU’s own biodiversity targets for 2020 now relies on initiatives from member states.

• Experts from leading organisations offer six ‘immediate actions’ needed to be taken by member states, and six actions for the EU to avoid reforms that allow on-going agricultural intensification under a ‘green’ label.

Latest reforms of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) have been declared significantly “greener” by the Members of the European Parliament, following promises to make the environment and climate change ‘core issues’ for the new CAP.

However, leading conservation experts writing in the journal Science warn that after three years of CAP negotiations the environmental reforms are so diluted they will be of no benefit to European wildlife, and biodiversity will continue to decline across the continent.

Under the new CAP almost a third of direct payments to farmers are now subject to conditions relating to ‘greening measures’. However, disagreements over the measures have led to a wide range of exemptions being put in place.

After analysing the details of the reformed CAP, experts from a number of major organisations revealed that about half of all farmland and 80-90% of all the farmers in the EU could be exempt from having to abide by two of the three new environmental requirements. At the same time, budgets to support voluntary ‘greening measures’ have been reduced.

Individual member states must use the flexibility offered by the reforms to design national plans for sustaining ecosystems, say the experts. Unless member states take serious steps beyond those required for the CAP, the EU’s own biodiversity targets for 2020 are very unlikely to be met.

“The weak environmental reforms in the CAP put the fate of Europe’s declining biodiversity at the hands of the individual member states,” said Dr Guy Pe’er, lead author from the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, who collaborated with a range of experts from the Universities of Cambridge, Kent, Freiburg, Hohenheim, Bern, Wageningen MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Hungary; Writtle College, and several conservation organizations (the Society for Conservation Biology, Royal Society for Protection of Birds, BirdLife Europe, Butterfly Conservation Europe and Friends of the Earth – Switzerland).

“The EU should openly communicate this dependency, and encourage member states to make responsible decisions, rather than pretend that the reform allows meeting the EU’s important ecological targets”, says Pe’er.

The authors maintain that expansion of the EU and its common market continues to drive agricultural intensification across Europe at the expense of wildlife and natural habitats. .

The Common Agricultural Policy – which uses almost 40% of the EU’s budget and influences the management of half of its entire territory – provides subsidies that increase the scale of farming throughout the EU. This has led to increased grassland conversion and peatland drainage. The situation is particularly severe in new member states, where the use of agri-chemicals such as fertilizers has grown rapidly.

This continues to take a heavy toll on wildlife, with dramatic declines in everything from the farmland bird index to ‘permanent’ grassland that, in newer member states, has shrunk over 11% in just the last decade.

To address this, the new CAP made 30% of all direct payments to farmers conditional on compliance with three ‘greening measures’: establishing Ecological Focus Areas, maintaining permanent grasslands, and setting minimum requirements on number of crops grown to stop areas slipping into homogenous ‘monocultures’.

However, following thorough analysis, experts have found that the large number of clauses introduced to the greening measures exempt over 88% of farmers in the EU, and over 48% of its agricultural areas from having to incorporate Ecological Focus Areas. 81% of arable farmers are now exempt from the crop diversity measure, and the measure meant to protect natural grassland allows a further loss of 5% of their extent by 2020.

“The measures themselves do not include quality criteria for what counts as green,” said Pe’er. “There is little evidence of safe-guards in place to prevent continuing intensification of agricultural practices”.

The authors conclude that the CAP reforms fail to fulfil Target 3A of the EU Biodiversity Strategy, which explicitly requires the EU to “maximise areas […] covered by biodiversity-related measures under the CAP”.

“Many regions of the new member states, and countries of southern Europe, are still supporting very high biodiversity”, says András Báldi from the MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Hungary. “But there are new member states who were against agri-environment schemes, and some already decided to shift budgets away from Rural Development into Direct Payment for farmers, where the vast majority of farmers are exempt of any environmental requirements installed. Without obligation from Brussels, we may see no greening taking place”.

“The EU Biodiversity target implicitly assumes that the biodiversity-related measures under the CAP are effective at protecting wildlife. While some specific, carefully designed actions – such as planting flowers for pollinators, restoring species-rich grassland, or providing nesting areas for ground-nesting birds – have been shown to work when properly implemented, these are not included as options under the new compulsory greening elements,” said Dr Lynn Dicks, a co-author from the Department of Zoology in the University of Cambridge.

“The CAP should pay for ‘public goods’ associated with sustainable farming: thriving wildlife, beautiful landscapes, clean water, fertile soils, land that contributes to a stable climate, and diverse communities of wild insects to pollinate crops or regulate pest outbreaks. These are things enjoyed by everyone but not so easy to pay for through food sales.”

“Finding a way to produce enough food for humanity without losing these assets is perhaps the biggest challenge of the twenty-first century. Unfortunately, the latest CAP reform has not found a way to secure them.”

The authors offer six ‘immediate actions’ that states should take. These include maximising budgets to Agri-Environment Schemes, and carefully defining what crops and management prescriptions qualify as Ecological Focus Areas.
They also list six recommendations for the EU to consider towards the next, still-much-needed revision of the CAP.

They hope these recommendations encourage individual states and the EU as a whole to move towards sustainable agriculture, securing biodiversity and vital ecosystem services for current and future generations. 


G. Pe’er, L. V. Dicks, P. Visconti, R. Arlettaz, A. Báldi, T. G. Benton, S. Collins, M. Dieterich, R. D. Gregory, F. Hartig, K. Henle, P. R. Hobson, D. Kleijn, R. K. Neumann, T. Robijns, J. Schmidt, A. Shwartz, W. J. Sutherland, A. Turbe, F. Wulf and A. V. Scott (2014): EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity. SCIENCE, 6 June 2014, Vol. 344, Issue 6188. DOI: 10.1126/science.1253425.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1253425


For an open access version of the paper and download of high-resolution pictures see http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=1625


Further information:

The EU Biodiversity 2020 Strategy: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/2020.htm

The Convention on Biological Diversity Aichi Targets: http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/

The following institutions were involved in writing this paper (authors are listed below with appropriate institution number):

1. UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Conservation Biology, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
G. Pe’er (English, Hebrew)
+49-(0)341-235-1643
http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=15885
K. Henle (German, English)
+49-(0)341-235-1270
http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=1868
R. K. Neumann (German, English)
http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=21429

2. University of Cambridge, Department of Zoology, CB2 3EJ Cambridge, UK.
L. V. Dicks (English)
+44 (0)1223 761362
http://www.zoo.cam.ac.uk/directory/lynn-dicks

3. Microsoft Research - Computational Science Laboratory Cambridge, Cambridge CB12FB UK.
P. Visconti (English, Italian)
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/a-pierov/

4. University of Bern, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Department of Conservation Biology, Bern, Switzerland.
R. Arlettaz (French, English)
+41 (0) 31 631 3161
http://www.iee.unibe.ch/cb/content/about_us/staff/arlettaz/index_eng.html

5. MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Vácrátót 2163 Hungary.
A. Báldi (Hungarian, English)
http://www.nhmus.hu/~baldi/

6. University of Leeds, School of Biology, Leeds LS29JT UK.
T. G. Benton (English)
+44(0) 113 34 32886
http://www.fbs.leeds.ac.uk/staff/profile.php?tag=Benton_T

7. Butterfly Conservation Europe, Wageningen, NL.
S. Collins (English)
http://www.bc-europe.eu/

8. University of Hohenheim, Institute for Landscape and Plant Ecology, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
M. Dieterich (German, English)
+49 (0)711 45923530 or +49 (0)7021 735942
https://ecology.uni-hohenheim.de/person/martin-dieterich-1

9. RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire SG19 2DL, UK.
R. D. Gregory (English)
http://www.rspb.org.uk/ourwork/science/team/361899-richard-gregory

10. University of Freiburg, Department of Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, 79085 Freiburg, Germany.
F. Hartig (German, English)
+49-761-203-3747
https://www.biom.uni-freiburg.de/mitarbeiter/hartig

11. Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany.
P. R. Hobson (English)
+49-3334-657-178
http://www.centreforeconics.org/the-centre-and-who-we-are/who-we-are/

12. Wageningen University, Resource Ecology Group, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
13. Alterra, Animal Ecology Team, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
D. Kleijn (Dutch, English)
+31-317-485807
https://www.wageningenur.nl/en/Persons/David-Kleijn.htm

14. Stichting BirdLife Europe, 1060 Brussels, Belgium.
T. Robijns (Dutch, English)
+32 (0)2 238 50 91
http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/partnership/team

15. UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Environmental Politics, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
J. Schmidt (German, English)
+49-(0)341-235-1406
http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=31839

16. Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, 32000 Haifa, Israel.
17. University of Kent, Durrell Institute Conservation and Ecology, CT2 7NZ Canterbury, UK.
A. Shwartz (English, Hebrew)

18. BIO Intelligence Service, 9200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
A. Turbe (English)
http://www.biois.com/en/bio-team/project-managers/anne-turbe-2.html

19. Pro Natura - Friends of the Earth Switzerland, 4018 Basel, Switzerland.
F. Wulf (German, English)
+41(0) 61 317 92 42
http://www.pronatura.ch

20. The University of Reading, School of Agriculture, policy and development, Centre for Agri-Environmental Research (CAER), RG6 6AR Reading, UK.
A. V. Scott (English)
+44 (0)118 378 4541
http://www.reading.ac.uk/caer/staff_anna_scott.html

Tilo Arnhold | UFZ News

Further reports about: Conservation Ecology Environmental Helmholtz-Zentrum UFZ farmers grassland

More articles from Studies and Analyses:

nachricht Memories Influence Choice of Food
22.05.2015 | Universität Basel

nachricht Memories Influence The Decision in Choosing Certain Foods
21.05.2015 | Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

All articles from Studies and Analyses >>>

The most recent press releases about innovation >>>

Die letzten 5 Focus-News des innovations-reports im Überblick:

Im Focus: Basel Physicists Develop Efficient Method of Signal Transmission from Nanocomponents

Physicists have developed an innovative method that could enable the efficient use of nanocomponents in electronic circuits. To achieve this, they have developed a layout in which a nanocomponent is connected to two electrical conductors, which uncouple the electrical signal in a highly efficient manner. The scientists at the Department of Physics and the Swiss Nanoscience Institute at the University of Basel have published their results in the scientific journal “Nature Communications” together with their colleagues from ETH Zurich.

Electronic components are becoming smaller and smaller. Components measuring just a few nanometers – the size of around ten atoms – are already being produced...

Im Focus: IoT-based Advanced Automobile Parking Navigation System

Development and implementation of an advanced automobile parking navigation platform for parking services

To fulfill the requirements of the industry, PolyU researchers developed the Advanced Automobile Parking Navigation Platform, which includes smart devices,...

Im Focus: First electrical car ferry in the world in operation in Norway now

  • Siemens delivers electric propulsion system and charging stations with lithium-ion batteries charged from hydro power
  • Ferry only uses 150 kilowatt hours (kWh) per route and reduces cost of fuel by 60 percent
  • Milestone on the road to operating emission-free ferries

The world's first electrical car and passenger ferry powered by batteries has entered service in Norway. The ferry only uses 150 kWh per route, which...

Im Focus: Into the ice – RV Polarstern opens the arctic season by setting course for Spitsbergen

On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 the research icebreaker Polarstern will leave its home port in Bremerhaven, setting a course for the Arctic. Led by Dr Ilka Peeken from the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI) a team of 53 researchers from 11 countries will investigate the effects of climate change in the Arctic, from the surface ice floes down to the seafloor.

RV Polarstern will enter the sea-ice zone north of Spitsbergen. Covering two shallow regions on their way to deeper waters, the scientists on board will focus...

Im Focus: Gel filled with nanosponges cleans up MRSA infections

Nanoengineers at the University of California, San Diego developed a gel filled with toxin-absorbing nanosponges that could lead to an effective treatment for skin and wound infections caused by MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), an antibiotic-resistant bacteria. This "nanosponge-hydrogel" minimized the growth of skin lesions on mice infected with MRSA - without the use of antibiotics. The researchers recently published their findings online in Advanced Materials.

To make the nanosponge-hydrogel, the team mixed nanosponges, which are nanoparticles that absorb dangerous toxins produced by MRSA, E. coli and other...

All Focus news of the innovation-report >>>

Anzeige

Anzeige

Event News

International symposium: trends in spatial analysis and modelling for a more sustainable land use

20.05.2015 | Event News

15th conference of the International Association of Colloid and Interface Scientists

18.05.2015 | Event News

EHFG 2015: Securing health in Europe. Balancing priorities, sharing responsibilities

12.05.2015 | Event News

 
Latest News

Mesoporous Particles for the Development of Drug Delivery System Safe to Human Bodies

22.05.2015 | Materials Sciences

Computing at the Speed of Light

22.05.2015 | Information Technology

Development of Gold Nanoparticles That Control Osteogenic Differentiation of Stem Cells

22.05.2015 | Materials Sciences

VideoLinks
B2B-VideoLinks
More VideoLinks >>>